Nothingness without Reserve: Fred Moten contra Heidegger, Sartre, and Schelling
نویسندگان
چکیده
Contemporary critical theory and black studies have witnessed a surge in theoretical accounts of “blackness” as “nothingness”. Drawing on the work poet cultural theorist Fred Moten, this article offers reading recent postulation blackness “nothingness” light some similar endeavors post-Kantian European philosophy. By comparing Moten’s “paraontological” conception nothingness to Heidegger’s self-nihilating nothing, Sartre’s relative nothingness, well Schelling’s notion absolute argues that paraontology presents more robust systematic than those Heidegger, Sartre, Schelling. way comparison with these “canonical” from philosophy, highlights not only unique features sophisticated formulation but also unacknowledged presumptions prejudices traditional metaphysics which calls into question.
منابع مشابه
Matter-Image or Image-Consciousness: Bergson contra Sartre
What brings together Henri Bergson's Matter and Memory and JeanPaul Sartre's Imagination and The Psychology of Imagination is the question of the ontology of the image. Bergson attempts to use the image to bridge the gap between mind and matter by refusing to distinguish clearly between what he calls “matter-images,” “perception-images,” and “memory-images.” By defining both consciousness and t...
متن کاملTruth without contra(di)Ction
If P , doesn’t it follow that ‘P ’ is true? And if ‘P ’ is true, doesn’t it follow that P? Well, that arguably depends. If I am hungry, it does not follow that your utterance of the sentence ‘I am hungry’ is true—you might well not be hungry, in which case your utterance would intuitively be false. It is not even clear whether and in what sense it follows that the sentence ‘I am hungry’ is true...
متن کاملBeing and Almost Nothingness
I am attracted to ontological pluralism, the doctrine that some things exist in a different way than other things.1 For the ontological pluralist, there is more to learn about an object’s existential status than merely whether it is or is not: there is still the question of how that entity exists. By contrast, according to the ontological monist, either something is or it isn’t, and that’s all ...
متن کاملAdler and Sartre: comment.
I was very much interested in the article by Rom and Ansbacher entitled "An Adlerian Case or a Character by Sartre?" (4) not only because of its intrinsic value but also because I had myself analyzed the hero of Sartre's story "Erostratus" (5, pp. 41-58) and others of this author's characters from the angle of Adler's Individual Psychology some I 5 years ago (6, 7). Before quoting from this ana...
متن کاملThe expectation of nothingness
While all psychologically competent persons know that they will one day die, this knowledge is typically held at a distance, not fully assimilated. That is, while we do not doubt that we will die, there is another sense in which we cannot fully believe it either. However, on some rare occasions, we can grasp the reality of our mortal nature in a way that is seemingly revelatory, as if the fact ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Comparative and Continental Philosophy
سال: 2022
ISSN: ['1757-0646', '1757-0638']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17570638.2022.2091971